 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
I didn't start really paying attention to the testimony until Depp took the stand, so I re-watched all of his teams witnesses the last few days. I've noticed a very disturbing pattern I think calls into question the honesty of all of his witnesses.
Firstly, I'm not really talking about the witnesses he out up that were there to testify that they never saw bruises (e.g. the LA condo staff, police, etc). I'm strictly talking here about the witnesses who were more involved with the actual events.
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
I'm talking specifically about Depp's sister/personal manager, his doctor, his nurse, his security people, Amber's personal assistant and Amber's makeup artist.
Watching all that testimony back-to-back makes a peculiar pattern readily apparent...
All of these witnesses have great memories around all the events, text messages, audio, etc when that testimony is good for Depp.
Yet, mysteriously, their memory is not so good anytime the details are bad for Depp. Even when confronted with texts/emails the witnesses wrote, they consistently "don't recall" anything at all that might be bad for Depp.
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
Taken in isolation, it isn't surprising that any single item might not be remembered. But when you look at the pattern across all of these witnesses, it becomes readily apparent that their inability to recall is almost exclusively limited to things in evidence that would be bad for Depp.
Let's take the sister/personal manager as an example. She has total recall about all kinds of details of Depp's life. She was his sister AND personal manager after all.
Yet when shown evidence of texts she wrote that clearly show concern for Depp's drug & alcohol abuse and violence, she can't recall anything. She will not even admit that when she texted Depp telling him to stop the booze, cocaine, etc that she was referring to his drug usage.
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
Her testimony is littered with similar examples where she just cannot recall thinking she was concerned about Johnny. Instead, she frames everything as her reacting to what Amber is telling her without any outside knowledge of his behavior. When shown communications she had with others about Depp's behavior at the time, again it is all "I don't recall".
Next we get Depp's friend Isaac. He wasn't really terribly bad at this. Far better than the other witnesses we will discuss below. He doesn't really have any damning testimony one way or the other and, frankly, I have no idea why he was on the stand other than to say he never saw bruises.
Skipping over the next few witnesses who didn't have any direct experience, we come to Heard's former assistant Kate James. Wow, she sure was something, eh?
Mrs. James pretty obviously had an axe to gringbwith Heard after she was fired without notice which she claims she was not angry about. Yeah, right gimme a break... everyone is angry when they are fired outta the blue and the emails/texts she sent at the time make that kinda obvious.
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
Her tone toward Heard's attorney is sparky at best the entire time. Odd for someone to be so sparky toward opposing counsel who never even came close to anything that could be considered badgering.
Anywho, Kate's memory is superb when testifying about things that make Depp look good and Amber bad. But she can't recall anything around texts/emails between her Johnny and others when the issue in question is something that might make Depp look bad. Her animosity toward AH is thick and undeniable and she clearly loves Depp. I'm not really sure what her testimony was supposed to prove other than AH is bitchy and overly dramatic as if Depp isn't also clearly over dramatic.
Next we get Laurel Anderson who was Depp and Heard's couples counselor. She is the ONLY witness Depp's side called who had any meaningful knowledge of the events who does NOT hide behind "I do not recall". And hwr testimony is really really bad for Depp. She says they both admitted to being physically abusive, both admitted to initiating physical violence. Depp tells her, " She gave as good as she got" after admitting to participating in physical violence. She does say that it was her perception that AH initiated physical violence more than Depp (guess that is what Depp was after). She's less sure about frequency of Depp initiating physical violence, but concludes they are "mutual abusers".
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
She is the ONLY witness we've heard from so far who comes off as actually unbiased and her testimony is terrible for Depp.
Next we get Dr. KIPPER. It's obviously not his first court rodeo. He seems well prepared. His notes are kinda undeniable, so he does end up admitting a bunch of evidence that is bad for JD.
For example, he was apparently administering drug tests to JD regularly from 2014 to 2019. He claims the records from 2014 and 2015 were potentially missing due to an office flood though he's careful not to actually make that claim, just hint at it. Convenient those years happen to be the ones in question. But whatever. He does say that Depp was failing those tests regularly from 2016 to 2019 for cocaine, benzos, Adderall and other stuff.
Throughout his testimony, he has great recall around all the treatment. Yet when confronted with texts and emails between Depp and himself that make Depp look bad, once again it is all "I don't recall".
Hmmmm...
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
This all comes to a head in Nurse Lloyd's testimony. She can't recall jack shit unless it makes Depp look good.
Seriously, watch her testimony again. Her memory is great about treatment protocols and such. You know, the kinda I-do-this-stuff-every-day the details of which are far more likely to be forgotten than wild unique events.
Let me give you examples. Nurse Lloyd cannot recall Marilyn Manson visiting Depp while under her treatment despite being shown text she wrote about it. Really???
Is it believable that someone wouldn't remember Marilyn Manson visiting even after seeing texts she wrote expressing her concern about the visit and Depp ignoring their protocols to go on a bender.
She also can't remember why the Doctor refused to continue working with Depp after the incident despite being shown several exchanges between herself and Depp and herself and the doc.
I'm only giving two examples here. There must have been 40-50 specific examples like this though inherent testimony. Over read diver she says "I cannot recall" while being shown evidence one would obviously recall. In damn near every incident she cannot recall. It is something that makes Depp look bad. Her recall on things that make Depp look good on the other hand is damn near perfect.
 |
| Ambers sides saying Depp's witnesses can't seem to recall anything! |
Taken as a whole, this pattern of "I don't recall" cannot be dismissed. Every single witness he puts up who has actual involvement in these events exhibits the same pattern.
When taken as a whole, it is obvious these witnesses are lying about what they actually remember. They have zero credibility.
I may very well be writing the same criticism after Heard's witnesses testify. But as it stands we've onky seen Depp's side. And the only credible witness who didn't hide behind "I can't recall" was the couples counselor who concluded they were "mutual abusers".
I really wish I had the time to put together a duper cut of every time one of his witnesses said I don't recall. If we remove specific dates people can't recall which is totally normal, I bet 90%+ of the "I don't recall" statements are made about items that make Depp look bad.
It ain't even close and a pattern like that is not normal. It is indicative of people providing false or misleading testimony.
If Depp didn't do these things, why can't any of his witnesses recall anything around these events that paint him in a negative light?
0 Comments